Hillary shows her true colours on climate

America, in the words of its own president and close compadre of the oil industry, George W. Bush, is “addicted to oil”. Tackling this addiction and turning the country away from its grossly unsustainable frenzy of consumption is essential if the world’s number one energy hog and CO2 polluter is to begin to mend its ways.

Great news then that the reign of America’s worst environmental president in at least a century is now in its last couple of hundred days. By January next, a new president will be in the White House and the serious work of tackling the climate crisis can begin. Right? Wrong.

Republican candidate John McCain, despite all his recent huffing and puffing about being a ‘custodian of the environment’ in the tradition of Theodore Roosevelt no less, was the first to float the idiotic notion this week that a cut in federal tax on petrol was just what the US needs.

Still, what would you expect from a Republican candidate? When push comes to shove, McCain was never going to stray too far offside from the demands of his Hummer-driving, bible-thumping, gun-totin’ voter base.

Thank goodness therefore for those eco-friendly care bears in the Democratic Party. Like Hillary Clinton. No sooner had McCain floated his ludicrous plan to cancel suspend the federal excise tax on petrol (18.4 cents a gallon) than presidential wannabe Hillary, quicker than you can say “Peak Oil”, comes out and backs this lunacy.

Of course it’s a temporary measure, just for what they call the “summer travel season”. What principled politician would want to do other than pander to the American public in its collective delusion that its oil orgy can go on indefinitely?

Hey, why bother buying a fuel-efficient car, when John and Hillary will simply pull a few strokes to get your six-litre behemoth back on the freeway, right in time for the “travel season”. Ain’t democracy grand?

To his huge credit, Barack Obama has to date resisted joining in this Mad Hatter’s Oil Party being thrown by Clinton and McCain. Here’s what the New York Times had to say about it:

“This is not an energy policy. This is money laundering: we borrow money from China and ship it to Saudi Arabia and take a little cut for ourselves as it goes through our gas tanks. What a way to build our country.

“When the summer is over, we will have increased our debt to China, increased our transfer of wealth to Saudi Arabia and increased our contribution to global warming for our kids to inherit.

“No, no, no, we’ll just get the money by taxing Big Oil, says Mrs. Clinton. Even if you could do that, what a terrible way to spend precious tax dollars — burning it up on the way to the beach rather than on innovation?”

Touché. Still, if we’ve learned anything from the past, it’s that we’ve learned nothing from the past. Well, certainly that’s the case for Hillary. Her husband used his eight-year presidency to re-write the rules and give ludicrous tax breaks to SUV drivers.

Why? It was a nod to Detroit and its unionised, Democrat-voting workforce. Bill Clinton’s message was simple: we’ll bend the tax system to prop up the inefficient US motor industry by subsidising its production of monster trucks. And even compared to the SUVs that stalk the streets of south Dublin, the US fleet is positively leviathan. Half of the private ‘cars’ in the US are in fact what are classified as ‘light trucks’.

And as Bill went, Hill follows. For this alone, she has shown herself unfit to be entrusted with the presidency at this most critical moment. A politician who so utterly fails to grasp the magnitude of the crisis that lies ahead would represent little more than a change of upholstery in the Oval Office.

The truly sad fact is that politics could be such a powerful force for good. New Australian prime minister, Kevin Rudd has in the space of a few months turned around the environmental vandalism of the Howard era and is beginning to make impressive inroads into tackling Australia’s profound climate-driven issues.

These include the state of near-permanent drought now gripping once-fertile parts of the sub-continent, as well as the virtual collapse of the Murray-Darling river system, which has been severely drained by reckless agricultural irrigation programmes.

When it comes to tackling the climate/sustainability crisis, political leadership, Al Gore famously remarked, is a renewable resource. If that’s the case, we can only assume he, like the rest of us, is quietly rooting for the senator from Illinois.

ThinkOrSwim is a blog by journalist John Gibbons focusing on the inter-related crises involving climate change, sustainability, resource depletion, energy and biodiversity loss
This entry was posted in Energy, Global Warming, Habitat/Species, Sustainability and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Hillary shows her true colours on climate

  1. Eoin says:

    The gas tax holiday plan is lunacy. Auction politics at its worst.

  2. Tigerland says:

    Right on. Always knew there was something deeply phoney about her. At least Slick Willie was a real character, with real flaws. Hillary comes off like a robot who will walk thru walls to get power. Principles? Ha bloody ha.

  3. Wexford gal says:

    The Clintons did a lot for Ireland so for that alone, i hope Hilary gets the job, she’d be a great friend in the White House and in the yaers ahead we’ll need all the friends we can get. Has Obama ever set foot in our country? Could he even find it on a map? Anyway, time for a woman president! Go Hilary go!!

  4. Tomboy says:

    John, read your piece about Hilary and Obama and McCain in the Times yesterday. Have to agree that she’s just not to be trusted, she just seems to want power, at any price, so she’ll sell the US down the same river that Bush Oil Inc. has been flooding for the last 7 or 8 yrs. Too bad we don’t get to vote in US elections, since we’re all stuck with whatever gouger or nut they put into the White House (OK, maybe Obama is neither a gouger nor a nut, but really, are they actually going to vote for a coloured guy? Sorry, just can’t see it happen, no matter how much he might deserve it.

  5. Marcus says:

    To Wexford gal:
    Would your seriously back Clinton simply because she set foot in Ireland? You would trust the worlds biggest super power to the hands of someone simply because she spent some time for photo shots next to her husband in Ireland? Surely there are better reasons than that to support her?

  6. Felix says:

    The idea for a tax break for the “summer travel season” is ludicrous. If it was introduced, it would be very unpopular to withdraw once winter comes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *